Approving and authorizing acceptance of grants from the Metropolitan Council's Local Housing Incentives Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, and amending the 2020 Budget.
Registered Vacant Buildings Contact DSI Code Enforcement Email Your ... Registration Requirements - What property owners must do to comply with the law.
PUBLISHED: January 4, 2020 at 5:33 a.m. | UPDATED: January 3, 2020 at 7:47
Sharon4USA
Against
City apparantly leaves Affiant Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson alone when Candidate 4 Office but for all these Propertys Deceptively Published without the Name of DSI iNSPECTORS, jURISDICTION/AUTHORITY of Marcia Mormond Leg Officer appt by Council Arbitrary http://taxthemax.blogspot.com
STP City Council Candidate Power Visit Invitation). By extending the respond-by date from Friday, October 5th at 5:00 PM to Tuesday, October 8th at 5:00 PM, we hope you can attend.
Ed Stuart
651-343-548
To Ron St. Paul Strong
CANDIDATE SHARON Respectivly decline
To much Violence re Bashing Trump via DFL
Sharon is the only Loyal Trump Supporter surrounded
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
MS 609.43 Misconduct, re Fidicuary Trust violated via
Illegal Contingency Funds, raising Taxes 2x% to Threaten
Voters. Use of Excessive Consumption/Inspections to harass
create Debt on Private Propertys Illegal Interest 4.5% to Condemn,
Confiscate, Theft by Swindle. Constitutionality of any/all Consent
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator's proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch
In a message dated 10/6/2019 9:32:21 AM Central Standard Time, roywmagnuson@gmail.com writes:
exposing Major Heinous of Courts exposing Vunerable Adult just because he was legally married to Affiant now Sharon Anderson http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com further on the Graves of Sharons Parents, Bill and Bernice Peterson, Tenants in Common at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN 55105.
rupted Judge Gregg Johnson and his Wife Susan Haigh to manulipate Medical Records and Jims Bigamy, Alcoholism No Valid Divorce and Transfer of Propertys was Issued via Corrupt Judges.
lleged Divorce File by Cor
His/Our Legacy's must remain forever on the Parchments of Forensic Files.
please note Sharon was Candidate Ward 2 in 2007 to make City Accountable stemming from the Auditor Lou McKenna Days 1980's Corruption in Propertys and Taxes and Honorable Litigant Frank Steinhauser, who by info and belief never agreed to Dismissal of USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher. AND Mike Volpe Chicago Author,Blogger,Journalist et al
RULING DOCUMENT OF CORRUPT DAVID LILLHAUG ASST.US ATTRY
June 17th 2007 Look at date of Blog up to 2019 Affiant Sharon Peterson Scarrella Anderson will Fight to the Death to Make City St.Paul,Courts,Council Accountable.
is hereby cancelled pending legal service, with statutority authority, approval to prosecute.
FURTHER: Pain, Suffering, Injury suffered by Sharon and the Citizenery, the Citys Intentional Infliction of Emotional Stress:
THEREFORE: Punative, Compensatory, Tort Damages triple as Whistleblowers
the mkt v. of 697 Surrey $137 thous X 3 =$400,000.00 for each and every occurrance.
The "taking" clause of the 5th Amendment provides the replacement value of Sharons Stolen Car & Trailer, plus lumber for fence, contents at least $100,000.00
Plus Attorneys Fees for Forensic Analyst, Whistleblowers, Private AG's at
Mail Fraud - Mail fraudTitle 18 sec 1341 - Google Search is a federal crime set forth at Title 18, section 1341 of the United States Code. Generally speaking, one engages in mail fraud whenever a person uses the U.S. Postal Service to advance, conceal, perpetrate, or further a scheme to defraud.
All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made Perez aware of Newell’s pending case against the City and the possibility that the Justice Department may intervene. A trade was proposed: non-intervention in Newell’s case for the withdrawal of Magner. Perez contacted HUD General Counsel Helen Kanovsky and asked her to reconsider HUD’s support for intervention in Newell’s case. Perez also spoke to then-Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Tony West and B. Todd Jones, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, alerting them to his new interest in Newell’s case. The withdrawal of HUD’s support for Newell’s case led to an erosion of support in the Civil Division, a process that was actively managed by Perez. In January 2012, Perez began leading negotiations with Lillehaug, offering him a “roadmap” to a global settlement. Once negotiations appeared to break down, Perez boarded a plane and flew to Minnesota to meet face-to-face with Mayor Coleman. At that early February meeting, Perez pleaded for the fate of disparate impact and reiterated the Justice Department’s willingness to strike a deal. His lobbying paid off when Lillehaug accepted the deal on Mayor
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator's proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch
Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson announces she is running for governor during a press conference at the Marquette Hotel in Minneapolis on June 4, 2018.Lacey Young | MPR News
The suddenly-intense race for Minnesota attorney general has brought new attention to the work of the state's top lawyer and an office whose role could shift dramatically under a new leader.
Lori Swanson, who's held the job since 2007, set off a scramble to replace her last week after announcing she would step down to run for governor. Five Democrats and three Republicans filed to take her place.
While Swanson and her political mentor and predecessor Mike Hatch made consumer fraud a priority, the role of attorney general as spelled out in state laws and the Minnesota Constitution is fairly open-ended, giving wide latitude to the person elected to the job.
Republican attorney general candidate Doug Wardlow speaks to delegates at the 2018 Republican Party state convention in Duluth.Derek Montgomery for MPR News
"Attorneys general run to be the people's lawyer and those kind of slogans are good for the voters but they don't help people understand what the attorney general really does," said John Tunheim, the state's chief U.S. District judge who previously spent more than a decade working as solicitor general and deputy under former Attorney General Skip Humphrey. "It's hard because the office is so wide-ranging in its purpose."
While consumer protection is a big part of the job — the most famous example is the landmark tobacco settlement in the 1990s that brought $6 billion into the state — Minnesota attorneys general have also pushed to change state laws and helped county prosecutors in high-profile murder trials.
They've also stepped in to check federal government action, a role that's increased the profile of the office for both parties during the Obama and Trump administrations. Republican attorneys general sued to block implementation of the Affordable Care Act, for example, and Democratic attorneys general, including Swanson, have acted to block the federal travel ban and policies on net neutrality.
They can also intervene when they feel the federal government has failed to protect the state's citizens, said Prentiss Cox, a professor at the University of Minnesota's law school who previously worked in Swanson's office. "The attorney general can step in and protect people in the state even when the federal government is running away 100 miles per hour."
The state's founders expected the attorney general would serve more as in-house legal counsel, defending day-to-day government decisions against lawsuits and providing advice on everything from education policy and prison meals to accidents that happen on the state's roadways.
Former DFL Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman files to run for Minnesota attorney general inside the secretary of state's office.Lacey Young | MPR News
It's not glamorous work, Tunheim said, but the attorney general's office managed bring in top attorneys with the promise that they would immediately get courtroom experience on a wide array of issues. "There are a lot of crises every day in state government," he said.
Attorneys general are also political figures. They run under party labels and can use that platform to push for changes to state policy.
Humphrey had several teams in his office working on policy initiatives, and his predecessor, Attorney General Warren Spannaus, famously ran and won on the issue of tougher restrictions on carrying and purchasing handguns. He pushed the Legislature to institute background checks.
Minnesota's attorney general has been a Democrat since 1971.
"You're sitting at the intersection of law, public policy and politics. To me that was absolutely fascinating," said Tunheim. "Politics shouldn't govern what you do but you have to understand that politics does play a role in shaping policy."
In Minnesota, there's no requirement that an attorney general be an active lawyer in the state, although they usually are.
U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison files to run for Minnesota attorney general inside the secretary of state's office.Lacey Young | MPR News
Attorney general candidate and current DFL U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison passed the bar in 1990 but his license is not active in Minnesota. Two of the candidates running on the Republican side have not passed the bar exam. Attorneys general can be current former legislators, judges or even members of the business community.
Hatch criticized DFL-endorsed attorney general candidate Matt Pelikan at the party's state convention in early June for lack of experience in the courtroom, saying he'd never tried a case. Pelkian dismissed this criticism, citing his work in civil litigation.
Most experts, though, don't see courtroom trial experience as a requirement to be effective as an attorney general.
It all comes down to "good judgment" in what cases they take on and what policies they push, said James Tierney, who teaches a class on the role of attorneys general at Harvard University.
"I've seen attorneys general get elected who are Rhodes Scholars who are just terrible, and some who have flunked the bar exam 10 times and they were fabulous because they had good judgment," he said. "Some of it has to do with personal background. How we make decisions can depend on where you came from in life."
Attorney general candidates: a snapshot
Keith Ellison
Practicing law since 1990; no active Minnesota license
• Legal background: Practiced criminal defense and civil rights law and served as head of nonprofit Legal Aid, which provides representation for low-income residents.
• Priorities as AG: Hiring good attorneys in the office, defend wage and environmental protection standards and push back on policies like Trump's travel ban in court.
Matt Pelikan
• Practicing law since 2012; active Minnesota license
• Legal background: Practices civil litigation and works on consumer issues for companies.
• Priorities as AG: Build up the state's antitrust practice and push for tougher gun control restrictions in the state.
Mike Rothman
• Practicing law since 1988; active Minnesota license
• Legal background: He spent years in private practice working on insurance regulation and other cases in Minnesota and California before becoming a state agency commissioner.
• Priorities as AG: Continue working on insurance and other consumer protection issues and build up that practice in the office.
Deb Hilstrom
• Practicing law since 2010; active Minnesota license
• Legal background: Worked in the Anoka County attorney's office as a prosecutor.
• Priorities as AG: Continue the consumer protection focus, including protecting seniors and vulnerable adults, while taking on the Trump administration in court.
Bob Lessard
• Not a lawyer.
• Legal background: Former legislator but no legal background.
• Priorities as AG: Protect the state's Legacy Funding, a dedicated sales tax passed by voters for arts, heritage and conservation projects.
Doug Wardlow
• Practicing law since 2004; active Minnesota license
• Legal background: Worked on behalf of property owners in eminent-domain cases and American Steel in trade cases with China.
• Priorities as AG: Building up the criminal practice and other areas of the office that have been underutilized.
Sharon Anderson
• Not a lawyer
• Legal background: None.
• Priorities as AG: Defend the state Constitution.
Tom Foley
• Practicing law since 1965; no active Minnesota license
• Legal background: Spent 16 years as Ramsey County Attorney and is a former commissioner of the National Indian Gaming Commission.
• Priorities as AG: Use his experience managing a public law office to build up the reputation of the attorney general and be an "independent" leader for the state.