MON7OCT2019 NOTE TO St.Paul Strong Ron,John Mannillo, John Hoeschler, and MPLS STRIB Maggie.kelly@startribune.com
cannot open your Questionaire, please send pdf format
APOLOGY IF IN DUPLICATE TROUBLE WITH PC
BLINDNESS AGGRAVATED BY CITY HALL
HARRASSMENT FOR DECADES.
THANK GOD PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS NOT A LIAR
OR LAWYER, ALTHO HIS LAWYERS APPEAL
Case 1:19-cv-08694-VM Document 35 Filed 10/07/19 Page 1 of 75 http://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2019/10/07/Mazars.pdf
To Isaiahmn.org
Ed Stuart
651-343-548
STP City Council Candidate Power Visit Invitation). By extending the respond-by date from Friday, October 5th at 5:00 PM to Tuesday, October 8th at 5:00 PM, we hope you can attend.
Ed Stuart
651-343-548
To Ron St. Paul Strong
CANDIDATE SHARON Respectivly decline
To much Violence re Bashing Trump via DFL
Sharon is the only Loyal Trump Supporter surrounded
by Dark Energy DFL.Nat Chair Tom Perez DFL Council et al https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
MS 609.43 Misconduct, re Fidicuary Trust violated via
Illegal Contingency Funds, raising Taxes 2x% to Threaten
Voters. Use of Excessive Consumption/Inspections to harass
create Debt on Private Propertys Illegal Interest 4.5% to Condemn,
Confiscate, Theft by Swindle. Constitutionality of any/all Consent
Agenda's that do not decend to particulars.
THEREFORE RON Please give Sharons time to others
Interesting would like to meet Helen Meyers.
2012 Re
Steinhauser v. City of St. Paul, 595 F. Supp. 2d 987 | Casetextsolution when Carter on City Council ? same time as
Steinhauser v. City of St. Paul, 595 F. Supp. 2d 987 | Casetextsolution when Carter on City Council ? same time as
oday's Active Topics
In a message dated 10/6/2019 9:50:12 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
| : | RES 12-554 Version: 2 | Name: |
| Type: | Resolution | Status: | Passed |
| In control: | City Council |
| Final action: | 6/13/2012 |
| Title: | Supporting an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that corporations are not persons. |
| Sponsors: | Dan Bostrom, Amy Brendmoen, Melvin Carter III, Kathy Lantry, Russ Stark, Dave Thune, Chris Tolbert |
| Attachments: | 1. Holben-Lundeen email in support of 12-554.pdf |
In a message dated 10/6/2019 9:32:21 AM Central Standard Time, roywmagnuson@gmail.com writes:Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
550 Vandalia St.
No comments:
Post a Comment